Autism Society records most keynote and concurrent sessions at their annual conferences. You can see and hear those recordings by purchasing full online access, or individual recordings.
Registered attendees have free access, please select the button above for the file you would like to access.
Purchase AccessFirst, evaluation data are often not fully considered when developing IEP objectives. This results in objectives that fail to target all of the critical areas related to the disability. For example, educational plans for students with ASD often only include goals that address “academic” areas and fail to adequately address other areas of need, such as social and communication skills. In reality, for students with ASD, the majority of the IEP objectives should target underlying needs in the areas of social understanding/functioning and communication. In fact, the law requires consideration of factors beyond academics in the development of IEPs (i.e., developmental and functional needs of the child). Failure to address all areas of need places districts in peril of legal recourse.
Next, there is an over-reliance on databases to “develop” IEP objectives. While these tools can be helpful, professionals still need to individualize the objectives to address the needs of a student in a given setting. Failing to adapt the IEP objectives results in “canned” goals that are not individualized. At times, objectives will address the key areas of concern, but miss the target by focusing on the wrong developmental level—failing to recognize necessary increments to long-term objectives. Setting the target behavior beyond reach defeats both staff and student. Data collection can be an obstacle. When IEP objectives are specific and measurable, they facilitate meaningful data collection. The objective itself may guide the method of data collection. For example, one student's IEP objective was to use a checklist to complete morning activities. The teacher kept the checklists as a means to collect data. Meaningful IEP objectives are based on the concerns of the parents, evaluation results and the strengths of the child. Further, the IEP team must consider the academic, developmental and functional needs of the child. This requires a process for evaluating needs, selecting priorities and developing meaningful individualized objectives.
This presentation will introduce tools for informal evaluation: the Underlying Characteristics Checklist and Individual Strengths and Skills Inventory. The Underlying Characteristics Checklist (UCC) provides a snapshot of how autism is expressed in an individual while the Individual Strengths and Skills Inventory (ISSI) helps to identify strengths and skills. This information provides a foundation for a collaborative team, including parents, to set meaningful goals and objectives. Once quality IEP objectives are developed, intervention and implementation are key concerns. Simply having IEP objectives does not mean that they will be accomplished. Schools are accountable for student progress, or lack of progress, on IEP objectives. While the IEP objective provides a goal to attain, it does not define the necessary strategies. Therefore, schools are also required to identify the supports and services necessary to implement the IEP objectives and to collect data to demonstrate that the strategies in use are effective. The Ziggurat Model aids in this process. Using the five levels of the Intervention Ziggurat, comprehensive intervention strategies are identified to attain the IEP objectives. These strategies are then incorporated into the framework of a student's daily schedule utilizing the Comprehensive Autism Planning System. CAPS is the tool that helps to ensure that needed interventions are being implemented throughout a student's day in order to help the student to achieve the IEP objectives.
Participants of this workshop will be able to:
• Name two pitfalls to developing quality IEP objectives
• List key IDEA requirements for the development of IEP objectives
• Describe two tools that facilitate the development of meaningful objectives
• Describe the process for selecting strategies and implementing them during a student's day
Learning Objectives:
Content Area: Education
Ruth Aspy, Ph.D.
The Ziggurat Group
Barry G. Grossman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist
The Ziggurat Group
Susan Jamieson, M.Ed.
Registered Educational Diagnostician
The Ziggurat Group