In this presentation, we will review research literature that discusses the barriers to positive outcomes for less externalizing individuals. We will review the features of less externalizing autism that are in direct conflict with obtaining supports. We will then explore how outcomes are impacted and the changes to policy and procedure that must happen to improve outcomes. Areas to be discussed are:
- Employment
- Gender risks
- Suicide
- Healthcare
- Maternal and reproductive healthcare
- Post-secondary access
- Rehabilitation services
- Diagnostic barriers
Ultimately, what this reflects is that current policy and misunderstanding of less externalizing autisms is in conflict with outcomes. We must shift thinking and understanding to embracing that autism is never easy and that while the challenges are uniquely different, they are no less impacting in regard to outcomes. Finally, rather than focusing on all the positive outcomes for a small percentage of individuals, in policy advocacy, we need to express these truths and demand enhanced services for transition to adulthood, post-secondary protocols and ongoing adult services.
Learning Objectives:
- Attendees recognize that "high functioning" doesn't mean improved outcomes.
- Attendees discover the research affirms that presumed competency is resulting in higher consequences.
- Discuss the various areas of difficulty that involve a failure to progress and actual regression in adult outcomes.
Track: Public Policy/Advocacy
Content Area: Current Research
Dena Gassner, Ph.D., student
Director Center for Understanding
Dena Gassner