The Autism Society Event and Education Recordings Archive

Use this site to access recordings and presentations from National Conferences

Autism Society records most keynote and concurrent sessions at their annual conferences. You can see and hear those recordings by purchasing full online access, or individual recordings.



4675 A Multi-Component Autism Awareness Training for Typical Peers


Friday, July 9, 2010: 2:30 PM-3:45 PM
Cumberland IJ (Hyatt Regency Dallas)
MP3 PDF Slides Handout

Registered attendees have free access, please select the button above for the file you would like to access.

Purchase Access
The current study challenges the widespread belief that sharing child-specific information with typical peers leads to stigmatization. A multi-component peer awareness training succeeded in positively changing both typical peer attitudes and behaviors toward a peer with autism. Via explicit educational training, interactive discussions and group exercises focused on the peer with autism, typical peer behaviors and attitudes showed statistically significant positive changes. These changes indirectly affected the child with autism, allowing for significant gains in initiation and responsivity rates.
In the literature on social inclusion of children with ASD, researchers have expressed concern about sharing child-specific information about children with autism with their typically developing peers (Campbell, 2006). Based on the current influx in ASD diagnoses, as well as the increase in mainstreamed/included children with an ASD diagnosis in schools, there is a need for increased awareness and understanding of autism by peers and educators. In my work as a one-on-one behavioral therapist with children with autism, I have seen improvements in the conversational skills, initiations and responsivity rates, and willingness to engage in a more expansive repertoire of activities in children with autism. What I have not seen, however, is an increased understanding of why these children act the way they do on the part of their typical peers, particularly with those on the lower end of the spectrum whose stimulatory behaviors, inflexibilities and communication difficulties may never completely dissipate. This lack of understanding hinders the rate of improvement in the previously mentioned areas in children with autism as their typical peers are hesitant to interact with them.

The current multiple-baseline across grouped participants (Bailey & Burch, 2002) study looks at the differences in attitudes and behaviors toward a child with autism based on a six-week autism awareness training. Three groups of three peers (N=9) met once a week for 45 minutes a day for six weeks. Each group met and discussed various topics related to diversity, minorities, disabilities, differences, similarities and autism. In addition to discussions, videos, books, simulation activities and additional critical-thinking activities were incorporated. Each participant's number of initiations and responses, both verbal and non-verbal, toward the child with autism was tracked throughout the intervention, with 3-month follow-up probes. To determine attitudinal changes, typical peer participants and non-participants were given a 22-question survey on their attitudes towards those with disabilities, both before and after the training.

Participant and non-participant scores were then compared to determine if the training had an effect on attitude change. To determine how this training indirectly affected the rate of initiations and responsivity of the child with autism, his rates were scored as well. Overall, significant improvements in both behavior and attitude were found in all participants. The noted improvements in the child with autism were especially gratifying because, although he received Pivotal Response Training (PRT) for the past five years, it had not resulted in any dramatic changes in his social abilities. He often remarked that others did not like him and he was well aware that people made fun of him and did not want to include him willingly, thus making him unwilling to participate himself. However, once his typical peers were nice to him and began including and helping him independently, his social behaviors expanded.

An additional characteristic of the current study that makes it beneficial is that it took place at an after- school program, the Boys' and Girls' Club. Very little research has been conducted at sites other than schools and, again, with the increase in children with ASD being included, there has been a rise in their participation at after-school sites and extracurricular programs. Thus, more research is needed in these sites.

Ultimately, this training will be manualized, as it is easy to follow and inexpensive to carry out. The biggest argument against sharing specific information about a child and his/her disability, specifically with peers, is that of increased stigmatization. This research suggests that child-specific information presented within a broader curriculum about autism does not lead to stigmatization, and may in fact have the opposite effect of helping children better understand and accept their peers with autism.


Learning Objectives:

  • Attendees will learn the difference between attitudes and behaviors
  • Attendees will learn the difference between directive, explanatory and descriptive forms of awareness training and how to integrate the three to create a cohesive training
  • Attendees will learn what components/information to include in an autism awareness training to make it successful
  • Attendees will learn that sharing child-specific information to typical peers does not lead to increased stigmatization of a peer with autism but rather behooves his overall social experience

Content Area: Education

Presenter:

Sarah E. Smith, B.A., Special, Education, Teaching, Credential
Program Supervisor at Koegel Autism Consultants
University of California at Santa Barbara

Sarah is an M.A./Doctoral student at UCSB, in Special Education with a Disabilities Risk Studies Emphasis. Sarah completed her Special Education teaching credential at UCSB and graduated from UCLA. Sarah is a program supervisor at the Koegel Autism Center. Sarah has a sister with autism and comorbid generalized anxiety disorder.